Supreme court: Liquor scam case against IAS officer and his family

Based on the news on the above case, the list of laws/acts, offenses, causes of action, details of the crime listed under the schedule referred to in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), and the conclusion given by the Supreme Court can be summarized as follows:

 Laws/Acts Mentioned:

1. **Income Tax Act**: Mentioned in the context of the financial irregularities being discussed.

2. **Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)**: Central to the discussion about whether certain financial actions constitute money laundering.

3. **Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS)**: Referenced in the context of predicate offenses.

4. **Prevention of Corruption Act**: Also mentioned in relation to predicate offenses.

5. **Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)**: Cited in relation to dealing with cases of predicate offenses.

6. **Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)**: Mentioned as part of the legal framework discussing the handling of such cases.

 Offense:

The offense discussed revolves around financial irregularities, including money laundering, tax evasion, corruption, and other related financial crimes. Specific attention is paid to the generation of money through corrupt means and its laundering.

Cause of Action:

The cause of action relates to the alleged misuse of official positions to benefit from the liquor sales and marketing schemes, leading to financial gain through corrupt practices and the subsequent laundering of these illicitly acquired funds.

Details of Crime Listed Under the Schedule Referred to in PMLA:

The crimes discussed in the context of the PMLA schedule include corruption, money laundering, tax evasion, and dealing with proceeds from narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, as well as terrorism-related activities under the UAPA. These are predicate offenses that lead to money laundering investigations.

 Conclusion Given by the Supreme Court:

The Supreme Court concluded that not all cases discussed qualify as money laundering under the PMLA because they do not meet the criteria set forth in the schedule of the PMLA. Specifically, for a case to be considered under the PMLA, the proceeds of the crime must originate from a predicate offense listed in the schedule of the PMLA. The Court indicated that some of the financial irregularities might fall under the jurisdiction of other laws like the Income Tax Act or the Prevention of Corruption Act, rather than constituting money laundering per se.

It's essential to understand that this summary is based on the specific details provided in the news and focuses on the legal aspects and the Supreme Court's interpretation of the PMLA in relation to the case discussed.